How to Use the iPad (iPhone) and iOS 5 in Litigation

Posted by wlansden | Filed under

By Brian Malcom

You have an iPad. You're an attorney and, worse yet, a litigator. Now what? The iPad is nothing new.  That sentence is shocking to read, but it is true. The iPad hit stores in April 2010.  The iPad 2 is a success, and we are nearing the release of the third-generation iPad.  What the iPad has lost in novelty, it has gained in utility. The native iOS 5 software and the App Store contain useful tools and applications to help you, the litigator, get the most out of your iPad or iPhone.

The following are some iPad and iOS features, applications and tips that litigators might find useful: 

iOS Features
:

- VoiceOver.  (Settings > General > Accessibility).  Eyes tired?  Long day staring at documents?  Don’t feel like reading that 500-word email?  In the car at a stoplight and don’t have time to read the whole email?  Why not listen to it with VoiceOver?  If you have an iPad or iPhone, you already have the capability.  Simply adjust your Accessibility settings so that VoiceOver is on, point to text and let your iDevice read the contents of your screen to you.  For quicker access to the VoiceOver feature, go to the Accessibility settings screen and adjust “Triple-Click Home” to “Toggle VoiceOver”.  Now VoiceOver can quickly be turned on and off by tapping the Home button (circular button with the square in it on the iPad body) three times in quick succession. Caution: Be sure to familiarize yourself with the touch controls while VoiceOver is on before turning VoiceOver on.  The touch controls are slightly different.  Here are some quick tips on VoiceOver touch controls:

  • Tap once on text to read the text aloud until the next HTML break, such as a paragraph break.
  • If you tap an on-screen button once, it will read the button function aloud and then you must double-tap the same button to activate the button. 
  • You must scroll with three fingers, instead of one. 
  • To jump to the next text field like Tab does on a keyboard, swipe one finger to the right.  To go back, swipe one finger to the left. 
  • To have VoiceOver read continuously through an email and not stop at each break, swipe two fingers in a downward direction on the screen after selecting the starting paragraph.
  • Remember, VoiceOver was designed to assist users with vision problems.  If it doesn’t make sense to you why VoiceOver is doing something, consider whether it would be helpful if you could not see your screen. 
- VPN and RDP.  (For initial setup: Settings > General > Network > VPN).  (Once settings are saved, toggle on by: (Settings > VPN). This one may require coordination with your IT department.  iOS 5 on the iPhone and iPad allows for VPN (virtual private network) access to your office network.  This is likely necessary to access information behind the security walls of most law firm computer networks.  Plug in your firm’s VPN settings and connect to the firm’s network via VPN.  Once connected, you can use a RDP (remote desktop protocol) app to remotely access your office workstation.  One RDP client app that I recommend is iTap.  You will need to know certain information about your computer’s identifying information and your user name and password.
- Lock Rotation.  Did someone email you a file with an incorrect orientation—in landscape when it should have been sent in portrait?  Well, if this happens to you, it can be a dizzying and annoying experience trying to tilt your iPhone or iPad just right so you can read the document.  The gyroscope and the reorienting feature of the iPad/iPhone is great…until it’s not.  There is a way to stop the screen from spinning.  Go to Settings > General and review the settings under “Use Side Switch to:”.  If “Mute” is checked, a double-tap of the Home button and a swipe of the App Tray to the right is how you will access your screen orientation lock button (double-tap home button and a swipe of the App Tray to the right is also how you access Lock Rotation on your iOS 5 or later iPhone). If “Lock Rotation” is selected, the slide switch on the side of your iPad above the volume controls will toggle your lock rotation feature on and off. If your screen continues to spin after locking the rotation, consult a physician.
- Mirroring.  Want to project the display of your iPad or iPhone on to a television or other screen for presentations or meetings?  Mirroring is a good option.  With an iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch running iOS 5 or later on the same WiFi network as an Apple TV (or the proper direct connection cable), a user can create a mirror image of what she sees on her iOS device on the screen connected to the Apple TV.  For instance, you can display what you see on your iPad on an LCD television.  This might be useful for presenting PDF files, web pages, or even training others on how to use the iPad.  Learn more about setting up and using Mirroring here. 
-AirPlay.  AirPlay also requires an iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch running iOS 5 or later connected to the same WiFi network as an Apple TV.  If you do not need all of the features of Mirroring and simply want to play a video, song, or display photos in a slideshow type format to a group, AirPlay might be right for you.  Learn more about setting up and using AirPlay here.

Apps:

- iAnnotate or GoodReader.  Litigators live and breathe PDFs.  Court filings, discovery productions, and client files all flood a litigator's email account with PDF files. Inevitably, an attorney will want to markup a PDF, make notes on a document or store certain PDFs on the iPad hard drive for quick retrieval later. Attorneys with iPads should have a PDF annotation and organization app. In my opinion, there are two clear leaders in this app category, iAnnotate and GoodReader.  Tip: While any PDF can be marked up and annotated in these programs, ensuring that the PDFs you use are OCRed prior to use with these apps will allow a user to make use of the full suite of features in both apps. To the extent possible, every PDF should be OCRed. (OCR is an initialism for optical character recognition.  It means the PDF is no longer just a flat image of the document. An OCRed document contains text recognized by computing devices–allowing text search and character highlighting.)  
  • iAnnotate.  A robust PDF markup and annotation program, that allows highlighting, underlining, typed notes, call-out notes, and more. If you will be doing a lot of handwritten annotation, I would recommend the purchase of a stylus. Targus makes a good, inexpensive stylus for the iPad. Google it or find a Best Buy.
  • GoodReader.  Learning from iAnnotate and similar programs that beat it to the punch, GoodReader recently updated its app to include substantial PDF markup and annotation tools.  The current features of this app are too many to list in this post, but the following are a few highlights litigators may find useful: 
    • Store files, such as but not limited to PDF files, on the iPad hard drive for quick, ready access;
    • Organize multiple files in folders and subfolders;
    • Highlight, markup and annotate PDFs;
    • Search OCRed PDFs;
    • Transfer files to iPad via USB, WiFi, email attachment or web download;
    • Attach files within GoodReader to emails (This is big, since the native Mail app in iOS 5 will not allow for email attachments other than pasting photos.);
    • Data protection or file encryption for locally-stored files;
    • Password protection of the entire GoodReader app or individual files with the app;
    • AirPrint; and
    • Integration with iCloud, Dropbox, other cloud data services. 
     

-Keynote.  An app version of Apple's answer to Microsoft PowerPoint, use Keynote to create, edit and deliver slideshow presentations. For presentations, get a HDMI cable to hook up to a television or use AirPlay Mirroring with an Apple TV.  Not a perfect app, but it may be the best app at what it does.
- Pages.  A trimmed-down and touchscreen-friendly word processing program, this app is no replacement for Microsoft Word on a desktop or laptop. Still, it is a useful tool for creating or editing the formatting of word processing documents. This post was created primarily using Pages.

- FedCtRecords.  Use PACER? Want access to PACER on your iPhone or iPad? This app is new and allows users to access PACER using their account information.  Since the app is relatively new, I have not had a chance to thoroughly test the app. There is only an iPhone version of the app for now, but it works with the iPad through the iPad's iPhone app compatibility feature.  This app is free for a limited time. After that, the rumor is it will be $19.99. Act now and save your $20.
- WestlawNext.  Westlaw research on your iPad, but this is not yet available for the iPhone. This app is highly functional with a WestlawNext subscription. Research case law, statutes, secondary sources and more on your iPad. Highlight text and make notes on Westlaw research materials. Save to WestlawNext's cloud-based, user-friendly folder storage. It is great for research on the go and may help you find that case you need even while you are in the courtroom. 

A
ccessories:
- Get the bigger hard drive?  If you are going to be storing large files or a number of files of any size on your iPad hard drive, this includes all your iTunes movies and your vacation photos, pay the extra money for a larger hard drive. Sure you could use cloud storage to virtually expand your hard drive.  But storing files in the cloud will require web access and patience to retrieve when those files are needed. Access to the former is sometimes difficult, and the latter is simply impossible for litigators.
- Keyboard or No Keyboard?  I am comfortable using the iPad on-screen keyboard. I don't want the bulk of a Bluetooth or dock keyboard, and that is one more thing I have to remember to carry.  Some people hate the lack of tactile feedback from the on-screen keyboard. This decision is pure preference. One point I would make is that if you prefer having use of your entire iPad screen, as opposed to two-thirds of the screen when the iPad soft keyboard is in-use, you may want an external keyboard.
- C
ase.  There is a reason there is no question mark after this header. You (or your firm if you're one of the chosen few) just shelled out a good bit of money for an iPad. iPads break or scratch. People are clumsy. I am sure Apple is working on an indestructible iPad, but until then, why wouldn't you protect your device? What's that?! You prefer the look of the iPad as Steve Jobs himself intended? Ok, then don't whine to anyone when your preference for aesthetics over practicality and protection bites you. Search the web. There is a wide array of iPad cases, covers, and shields out there to help protect your shiny object. Some even look nice. If you're an external keyboard person, there are a number of cases on the market with external keyboards integrated into the case itself.
- Stylus? If you think you want to create handwritten notes, draw, design, or simply hate fingerprints, a stylus may be right for you.  You can also digitally sign documents with a stylus and PDF annotation program.  
 

And two to grow on . . .
- Backup your device regularly, and encrypt your backup file if you store confidential information on your iPad or iPhone. New features such as wireless syncing and iCloud make this process easier than ever (well, less wire-intensive at least). Do it or risk regret.
- Siri Dates.  While this sounds like the worst name ever for a dating site for Apple fanboys and fangirls, Siri does a great job of calculating calendar dates and calendaring appointments.  If you have an iPhone 4S or otherwise have access to Siri (cough…cough…hacked), here is a quick tip.  Let’s say your client has been served with a complaint and under the applicable rules you have 30 days to respond.  You can simply ask Siri, “what is 30 days from December 25, 2011?”  Siri will respond with the date of 30 days following December 25, 2011, January 24, 2012.  If your client was served with a complaint on Christmas, I feel sorry for your client.  But you get the idea.  While Siri will not explain to you how deadlines are calculated under the applicable rules with respect to holidays, weekend and how to count the number of days (yes, I asked), a quick comparison of the result of the Siri inquiry and your own separate, educated calculation will tell you if Siri is counting the days correctly under the relevant rules. You can figure out what to do if the end date falls on a holiday or weekend on your own. Lawyer disclaimer: Siri is not a substitute for independent judgment. Heaven help us all when it is.

YLB - How to Use the iPad.pdf (442.34 kb)

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Blogging About Fitness to Judge Frowned Upon by Florida

Posted by wlansden | Filed under , ,
By Brian Malcom

Every young lawyer questions a judge's decision at some point.  There is an important distinction between a lawyer questioning a judicial decision in the back of his mind and blogging about the character and fitness of a judge, though.  Florida seems to agree.

Way back in 2006, when Web 2.0 was still thought to be a bad title for a Spiderman sequel, Sean Conway found himself questioning the ability of a certain judge to judge fairly.  A criminal defense attorney, Conway believed that a Florida circuit judge was seeking to deprive criminal defendants of their right to a speedy trial by allegedly systematically engineering the trial date so as to force the defendant to seek a continuance and waive his or her right to a speedy trial, according to the ABA Journal feature article on the matter.  The problem, it seems, was that the judge was trying to be too speedy and set trials for within a week of arraignment, rather than the normal four or five weeks after arraignment.

Conway tried to report this perceived injustice to a judicial watchdog agency, but he was not satisfied with the result.  So, Conway turned to the internet to publicize the allegedly improper actions of the judge.  Conway submitted this 11-paragraph post to the JAABlog.  In the post, Conway got a bit carried away--like giving the judge the nickname EUW, defined within the post as "EVIL, UNFAIR WITCH".

After unsuccessfully arguing that his post was protected First Amendment speech, Conway eventually agreed to a public reprimand and a fine of $1,250.

The ABA Journal article has many more tales and warnings about social media slip-ups by lawyers.  Be sure to check it out and learn from the mistakes of others.

Currently rated 4.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Smartphone Dilemma

Posted by wlansden | Filed under
By James Bowden

To iPhone or not to iPhone.  That’s a heck of a question.  With Verizon announcing that they will now carry the iPhone, I no longer have a leg to stand on in resisting upgrading my smartphone.  I love my BlackBerry, don’t get me wrong – it’s been durable and fairly user-friendly, and I really like the keyboard.  But it really is kind of the also-ran in the world of smartphones as far as functionality is concerned (not to mention that the Research in Motion guy tried to buy our hockey team out from under us).

I thought about getting the Google-Powered Android.  In a family where the iPhone is the accomplished, cool, and successful oldest child, the Android is definitely the quirky, hipster younger sibling; likely higher-functioning and superior, but only the truly patient and dedicated will ever know for sure.  Also, it just doesn’t feel lawyerly – perhaps if Westlaw had a smartphone operating platform, that would be the ticket.  It’s not like lawyers use Google in everyday practice, right?

So yes, please, I would like a phone that can tell me what restaurant I should choose.  I’d like to know that there is an app for that without burrowing through folders, etc., and I’m sick to death of reading the New York Times in the “mobile” format.  But will an iPhone give me any advantage as far as lawyering?

Some folks here at Waller are clearly on the verge of controlling DOD satellites with their iPads.  So I am way behind, and probably should be doing a much better job of integrating technology into my practice.  I’d like to think that an iPhone would give me some small edge, perhaps just in my ability to review documents attached as pdf files and do online research remotely.  This is usually how I justify tech expenditures – they may improve my efficacy, resulting in better and faster work and more time for fun.  But probably not.  I’ll probably just get an iPhone for the cool factor.

I would like to open up the comments for “Must-Have iPhone Apps for Lawyers.”  Please help this hopeless troglodyte app-up his new gear.

Currently rated 4.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

A Supreme Decision: iPad v. Kindle

Posted by wlansden | Filed under ,
By Brian Malcom

Okay, it may not be the Court's most "important" decision of the year, but it is indicative of the place eReaders are taking in the legal industry.  Gadget Lab of Wired.com is reporting that there is a split among two Justices in the iPad versus Kindle debate.  "Newly-approved Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan is a Kindle user, while longtime conservative Justice Antonin Scalia wields an iPad."

Justice Kagan revealed that she was a Kindle user in a recent C-SPAN interview, just in case you were not watching C-SPAN at that very moment.  Like myself (notice how I throw myself in the mix with two Supreme Court Justices very nonchalantly), the Justices use the readers to review briefs and filings.  Although, Justice Kagan admits she still prefers the occasional hard copy from time to time.

If anyone would benefit from an eReader, it is a federal judge.  Think about the amount of paper they receive on a daily basis.  Imagine being able to cut down on the clutter and the weight of the documents you have to take home to read each night.  Imagine all the trees the federal courts could save if they went entirely paperless.  This may be a pipedream right now, but one day it may be a reality.

Bravo to these two Justices for embracing these technologies.  Now, I wonder what Justice Kagan is reading on her Kindle in her free time (if any).  I also wonder what's on Justice Scalia's playlists in the background of his iPad while he peruses briefs.

Finally, do the Justices use the devices during oral arguments?

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Web 2.0: iPad iOS update 4.2

Posted by wlansden | Filed under , ,

By Brian Malcom 

Since I bought my iPad, I have been waiting on multitasking. When it came to the iPhone earlier this year, my anticipation grew for the release on the iPad. The recent update is full of features, just like the related update for the iPhone was a short while ago. Here are a few of the new features included in the recent IOS 4.2 update for the iPad that young lawyers might find particularly interesting or useful: 

Multitasking. This is the big one. This is the one we've all been waiting for on the iPad. The ability to play Pandora radio while surfing the web or acting out e-mails to clients or colleagues is a welcome addition to this device. Since the update, I have found that this new feature is functioning correctly, and I have not seen any significant decrease in battery life for my iPad. Simply double tap the home button to reveal a sliding menu across the bottom of the iPad and jump quickly from application to application. The iPad simply “freezes” apps when they are not in use so as to avoid unnecessary drain on battery. Apps that require background processes, like Pandora, maintain the necessary processes but freeze the unnecessary processes. 

The ability to create folders and sort apps into folders. If you're like me, the simplicity of the brand-new iPad home screen was quickly replaced with app upon app. This likely led to multiple pages of app icons. The only organization system that was available was to create separate pages, instead of folders, for categories of apps. Once the recent update to the iPhone came out, I began to crave the ability to create folders for categories of apps. Now one can do so. I maintain news, travel, lifestyle, shopping, finance, research, books, and law firm related folders. This makes it easier to find applications on the fly without using the search feature. Although, the search feature is still pretty handy when you can't find that missing application you know you downloaded. 

AirPlay. I'm not sure how “useful” this particular feature is to young lawyers specifically, but I'm sure some creative young lawyer out there will figure out its usefulness to the practice of law. Until then, it is a great feature for playing your iPad iTunes library through your Apple TV or through your Apple Airport Express music port. Music and pictures are streamed through wi-fi networks to create, what feels like, a high-end wireless home theater system. There is also the ability in iTunes to stream music to multiple AirPlay compatible devices, if you want to fill your entire house or office with the sound of your iTunes music. 

AirPrint. This feature is still a little buggy to me. Right now, it requires very specific printers specified by Apple in order to work correctly. Hacks and workarounds are popping up every day on the Internet to make this feature compatible with a broader variety of wireless printers. However, one should not have to resort to third-party trickery in order to make a standard feature on the iPad work with her home network. I understand that this particular feature gave Apple some headache immediately prior to the release of the iOS 4.2 update to the iPad. I can only hope that they had to limit the number of compatible printers in order to make the feature functional on short notice. So here's hoping they expand the number of compatible printers in the near future and offices figure out a way to incorporate compatible printers, so that we can wirelessly print e-mails and other things from our iPhones and iPads. 

Unified inbox. The “all inboxes” option under Mail now allows you to view all of your messages and all of your inboxes on one screen. This avoids a tedious exercise of jumping back and forth between inboxes just to see your new messages. Since most of us have at least both a work and personal e-mail account, this feature is particularly useful and will likely save some finger swiping. 

Find My iPhone or iPad. This feature was a pleasant surprise to me. The ability to remotely locate your iPad or iPhone has been available through MobileMe for some time now. The price to access this feature was $99 per year though. One had to purchase an annual subscription to MobileMe in order to keep track of his device. Now, Apple is giving it away. In order to use the feature, a user will have to follow the instructions and sign-up for a free MobileMe account. A single MobileMe account can be used to track multiple iDevices. You can also use the feature to remotely lock, remotely play a sound, or remotely wipe a device.  I have not tried any of these features beyond locating the device.  Note: the device has to be on and connected to the internet for this feature to work. 

Keyboard and dictionary enhancements. The new update includes support for over 50 languages and dialects, with more than 30 new international keyboards and dictionaries for iPad. So, for all you young attorneys with international clients or friends, this is a big step forward in facilitating communication with those people on your iPad. 

The ability to reply to calendar invitations. I'm actually strangely excited about this feature. With the update, you can now reply to event invitations from friends using calendar services like Yahoo and Microsoft exchange using the built-in Calendar application. There were few times where I wanted to reply to a calendar invite on my iPhone or iPad and I could not do so. Now I can. 

Other new features include different fonts for Notes, personalized text message tones, find text on webpages in Safari, and accessibility enhancements (including support for wireless Bluetooth refreshable braille displays). There are also enhanced enterprise supports included in the new update, which your IT department will likely care about but you probably don't. To update your device, simply connect the device to your iTunes and follow the instructions for the update.

Currently rated 4.8 by 4 people

  • Currently 4.75/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Labor Law and Facebook: Is Facebook the New Water Cooler?

Posted by wlansden | Filed under

By Brian Malcom

Can a person be fired for what they say on Facebook on their own equipment and on their own time?  The answer seems to be, "sure, sometimes, but not all the time."  Now the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") is getting in the mix.  The New York Times reports that the NLRB has accused a company of illegally firing an employee after she criticized her supervisor on her Facebook page. 

According to a November 2, 2010 News Release issued by the NLRB, the NLRB's Hartford, Connecticut office issued a complaint on October 27 alleging that an "ambulance service illegally terminated an employee who posted negative remarks about her supervisor on her personal Facebook page. The complaint also alleges that the company. . . illegally denied union representation to the employee during an investigatory interview, and maintained and enforced an overly broad blogging and internet posting policy."

Apparently, an employee of the ambulance service was asked to prepare a report concerning a customer's complaint about her work.  The employee requested representation from her union in order to assist her in preparing the report, but her request was denied.  That same day, the employee logged on to her Facebook page from her home computer and posted negative criticisms of her supervisor.  It seems as though she was not the only one with a bone to pick with her supervisor.  After she posted her comments, the employee's co-workers began chiming in with their own supportive comments for the employee and their own negative comments about the same supervisor. 

The New York Times reports that "Ms. Souza . . . mocked her supervisor on Facebook, using several vulgarities to ridicule him, according to Jonathan Kreisberg, director of the [NLRB's] Hartford office, which filed the complaint. He also said she had written, “love how the company allows a 17 to become a supervisor” — 17 is the company’s lingo for a psychiatric patient."  Look for calling someone a "17" to become more popular on the social network.

The ambulance service company was not about to click the "Like" button on this activity by its employees.  The company suspended and later terminated the employee for her Facebook comments.  The company took the position that the Facebook postings violated the company's internet and social networking policies.  But the story does not end there. 

The NLRB apparently got wind of the incident and launched its own investigation of the incident.  Following the investigation, the NLRB took the position that the employee's Facebook postings constituted concerted activity that is protected under the National Labor Relations Act.  Further still, the NLRB also took the position that the company's blogging and internet posting policy contained overly broad and unlawful restrictions on employees.  The NLRB believes the company's policy chills employees from making negative comments or disparaging remarks when discussing the company or its supervisors.  The NLRB also took issue with the policy's sweeping prohibition of depicting the company in any way on the internet without the company's express permission.  Because of the overly broad nature of the policy and its chilling effect, the NLRB is of the opinion that the company's policies interfere with a company employees' exercise of their right to engage in protected concerted activity. 

The case is not set for hearing until January 25, 2011.

With this as prologue, the debate begins. Can Facebook or other social networking sites effectively be mediums for employees to self-organize, "to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection . . . " so as to invoke the protections of the National Labor Relations Act?  This blogger believes that end result will be that some activity, not all, on Facebook or other sites among employees, as defined by the Act, is within the protections of the Act.  As such, employers need to keep an eye on this case and review their own internet and blogging policies, lest they find themselves drawing the ire of the NLRB and facing allegations of unfair labor practices.

Currently rated 4.3 by 3 people

  • Currently 4.333333/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This Blawg Post Will Not Satisfy Your Ethics CLE Requirement

Posted by wlansden | Filed under ,
By James Bowden

The American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20 Working Group on the Implications of New Technologies has published an Issues Paper Concerning Lawyers’ Use of Internet Based Client Development Tools and is requesting comments. Seeing as how the Young Lawyers’ Blog has both “Lawyers’” and “Blog” in our name, I felt obligated to provide my comments with reckless disregard for the instructions provided by the paper for the method of their delivery. In the interest of providing a cogent analysis succinct enough for young lawyers to not lose interest in, I’m going to ignore all elements of the paper not directed at blogging (although I’ve probably lost you already).

The main thrust of the paper’s discussion of blogs is the recognition that blogs maintained and contributed to by lawyers generally fit on a continuum somewhere between those residing on a law firm’s website that are clearly designed to serve an advertising and marketing function and those that are purely personal blogs which have nothing to do with a lawyer’s practice or the law. Where on the continuum a lawyer’s blog lies is a not unimportant question, especially considering that a blawg residing on a law firm’s website for advertising and marketing purposes would “almost certainly have to comply with the relevant state rules of professional conduct.” Even though the managing partner threatens to cut off the power to my office every time I say it, the Young Lawyers Blog is affiliated with Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, but independent editorially (see disclaimer). So I reviewed the content of our website, analyzed our relationship with the firm, perused comments opining that I am a “troglodyte,” and came to the conclusion that the Young Lawyers Blog is not purely designed to serve an advertising and marketing function. The Young Lawyers Blog is actually a blog about the Apple iPad, with snark.

The Working Group’s paper doesn’t really provide much in the way of answers to ethical considerations raised by the blogosphere, and don’t really come off as having much exposure to the blogosphere (c.f. the stilted definition given for a “blog”: “A blog is an Internet forum (a ‘web log’) that offers opinions or information, sometimes on a particular issue, such as intellectual property.” (note: nice save, Working Group – intellectual property law is all the rage with the cool kids these days!)). Instead, they provide a summary of questions for comment, which I, as Ambassador to the Working Group on the Implications of New Technologies for the Young Lawyers Blog, a title I earned by sheer chance and which I do not take lightly, will now answer in a flippant manner.

  1. I’m pretty sure blogs function just like any other writing that a lawyer publishes – if it is advertising, it is advertising. If not, it isn’t. I’m not a fan of considering blogging manifestly different from any other medium, requiring special treatment. In any case, doesn’t Rule 7.2 cover attorney advertising using blogs pretty effectively?
     
  2. Probably not necessary - See #1. Alternatively, an explicit statement that a blog is “public media” as used in Rule 7.2, made without a hint of irony at its redundancy, might be appropriate/entertaining.
     
  3. I think the touchstone here should be the purpose of the discussion forum or comment that the lawyer has created. If the purpose is advertising, then yes, disclosure is proper. If not, then not necessarily. For the grey areas, a lawyer treads at her own risk. The only special case here is that of the anonymous commenter – the ninja assassin of the blogosphere. My read on anonymous posters, however, is that an attorney putting together a problematic anonymous comment is far more likely to run afoul of Rule 1.6 than anything in Article 7, or alternatively commit defamation of character. Also, who doesn’t want to be identified as a lawyer? Lawyers are cool – watch Law and Order some time. Or The Deep End. On second thought, don’t watch The Deep End, ever.
     
  4. This one is a tough one for me to comment on, because I’m not particularly familiar with JD Supra;  the first thing that jumps out at me, though, is the tagline, “Give Content. Get Noticed.” So I’m going to go with Yes, Article 7 of the Model Rules applies. But even if it doesn’t, what lawyer would upload a crummy, error-ridden piece of garbage work product to a website used and reviewed by her competitors?
I’m not trying to make light of the ethical implications presented by blawgs; I’m actually very interested in them. But I do think that legal advertising and the rules that surround it, not to mention applicable First Amendment jurisprudence, is well developed enough to handle the issues presented by the internet. Attorneys using social media for advertising or non-work related activities alike should use appropriate caution. I don’t think that the idea that people need to be careful as far as what ends up on the internet is any secret; but if you need a couple of pointers, I think we can set up a panel discussion.

Currently rated 5.0 by 4 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

iPad Useful for Document Review

Posted by wlansden | Filed under , ,
By Brian Malcom

When the iPad was first released, syncing documents was cumbersome.  The user was required to place documents on the device using wi-fi transfers.  Now, you can use the sync cable included with the iPad to transfer documents from your computer directly to your iPad.  This allows for faster and more reliable transfers.  This is especially important with large documents, such as PDFs or PDF packages for document review.

After the tweak to the document transfer mechanisms for the iPad, the iPad has become a useful tool for reviewing large document productions.  In order to perform the document reviews, I recommend using GoodReader, an app available in the Apple app store.  This app, working in conjunction with iTunes, allows you to use your data sync cable to transfer large PDFs directly to the iPad.  You can password protect access to the GoodReader files for added security.  It also retains your place in reviewing a large PDF document, should you have to exit the app for any reason.  Another useful tool available in GoodReader is the ability to place and label bookmarks when reviewing a PDF.  This allows you to quickly flip through a large PDF file and flag documents of interest to your case.  You can display one page at a time if you are in portrait mode, or you can display two pages side-by-side if you were in landscape mode.  With the two pages side by side in landscape mode, you can quickly flip through large documents and then, by simply orienting the iPad into portrait mode, you can zoom in to a page that looks to be of interest.

One drawback I see with reviewing the documents on the iPad is the inability to print directly from the iPad.  You must use the bookmark feature or simply hand write the Bates number or PDF page number and print the pages later when you are at a PC.  This adds a frustrating little step in the process, but the convenience of being able to carry tens of thousands of pages in a lightweight electronic device with a fantastic user experience may outweigh this inconvenience.

Happy document reviewing.

Currently rated 4.2 by 10 people

  • Currently 4.2/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Lawyers USA Quotes Brian Malcom on Google Voice

Posted by wlansden | Filed under ,

Brian Malcom, a YLB Editorial Board member, was recently quoted in a Lawyers USA article discussing Google Voice for lawyers on the go.  Click here to read the article. 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Google Voice Open to the Masses

Posted by wlansden | Filed under , ,

By Brian Malcom

Last year, we told you about Google Voice.  The service allows users to forward calls from one Google Voice number to multiple, already-existing numbers.  For instance, you can have contacts call your Google Voice number, and then forward those calls to ring your desk, your home, and your mobile telephone.  Google Voice also offers some pretty cool extras, like transcribed voicemails and free long distance.

Though the service was once invite only, it is now open to all who wish to join.  If you are a solo practitioner or work for a small firm, this service may offer some assistance in managing your communications and keeping long distance costs down.  Learn more about it here.

Note: Some readers expressed some concerns regarding confidentiality and ethics because of Google's targeted advertising.  To date and to the best of our knowledge, no court or state has examined the issue.

Currently rated 3.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5